We examine premises, access, people, procedures and existing safeguards to identify weaknesses and what needs improving.
Six answers to the questions most often asked before an engagement.
The next step is a 30-minute discussion. The topic is preselected — you can change it in the form.
Book a discussion →Security teams, technical teams and managers responsible for premises and operations.
When measures exist but you are unsure they are implemented; when responsibility for responding is unclear; when the use of premises creates unnecessary exposure.
Premises, access, people, procedures, responsibilities and existing safeguards.
An initial 30-minute discussion, online or in person. You describe the situation; together, we define the approach.
These depend on the engagement, the size of the organisation and the number of locations. They are agreed after the initial discussion.
A building may have access control, procedures and other safeguards, yet still have weaknesses in their implementation. We therefore examine premises, people, procedures and responsibilities as one connected system.
Protection is only as strong as its least controlled point.
Critical areas and movement through the premises.
Who has access, to what, and under which conditions.
Roles and responsibilities in relevant situations.
Whether existing procedures are actually followed.
How security responsibilities are allocated.
Whether existing safeguards match the actual risks.
Physical and organisational security can form part of a broader security risk assessment. Where needed, we connect findings to other aspects of security to clarify priorities.
The Risk Check gives you an initial view of areas that deserve attention.
The Risk Check is an initial orientation, not a formal risk assessment.
{{ q.a }}
Tell us what you would like to check. Together, we define the next step.